ATLAS GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. LIANZHOU TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.

ATLAS GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. LIANZHOU TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT] The Federal Circuit affirmed the district court without opinion under Federal Circuit Rule 36. The judgment provides no reasoning or issue-specific holding. Because this is a Rule 36 affirmance, it resolves the parties’ appeal but provides no precedential guidance on the underlying patent issues. Affirmed. The appeal came from a patent case in the Eastern District of Texas before Judge Gilstrap. The Federal Circuit panel consisted of Judges Prost, Hughes, and Stoll. The court affirmed per curiam under Rule 36, so the judgment does not identify which district-court rulings or arguments drove the result. The extracted judgment does not specify the asserted patents, technology, claim issues, infringement theories, damages issues, or other merits questions. Rule 36 affirmance infringement non-precedential damages Rule 36 affirmance infringement non-precedential damages Rule 36 affirmance non-precedential