Yieldmo, Inc. v. Teads, Inc.

Yieldmo, Inc. v. Teads, Inc. The Federal Circuit affirmed the Southern District of New York's judgment under Fed. Cir. R. 36, so the district court's decision stands unchanged. The judgment gives no reasoning. The district court's ruling is left intact on appeal, but the bare Rule 36 judgment gives no reasoning or guidance on any issue. Affirmed. Yieldmo, Inc., the plaintiff-appellant, appealed from the Southern District of New York (No. 1:25-cv-00737-PAE, Judge Engelmayer); Teads, Inc., Teads SA, and Teads SARL are the defendants-appellees. The panel (Moore, Chief Judge, Stoll and Cunningham, Circuit Judges) heard argument and, per curiam, entered judgment on October 13, 2026: AFFIRMED under Fed. Cir. R. 36. The judgment states no reasoning and does not identify the patents, claims, or issues on appeal, so nothing can be drawn about the merits. non-precedential Rule 36 affirmance non-precedential Rule 36 affirmance Rule 36 affirmance