CAFC-DCTSeptember 15, 2026·26-1527·Affirmed.
ABC IP LLC v. PEAK TACTICAL LLC
District Court
Holding
The Federal Circuit affirmed the District of Wyoming under Federal Circuit Rule 36. The court issued no written opinion, so the basis for affirmance is not stated.
Why It Matters
Because this is a nonprecedential Rule 36 affirmance with no reasoning, it confirms the result below but provides no guidance on the underlying patent issues.
Full Summary
ABC IP LLC v. PEAK TACTICAL LLC [RULE 36 JUDGMENT]
The Federal Circuit affirmed the District of Wyoming under Federal Circuit Rule 36. The court issued no written opinion, so the basis for affirmance is not stated.
Because this is a nonprecedential Rule 36 affirmance with no reasoning, it confirms the result below but provides no guidance on the underlying patent issues.
Affirmed.
The Federal Circuit entered a per curiam Rule 36 judgment affirming the District of Wyoming.
The panel was Judges Lourie, Linn, and Chen.
The extracted judgment does not identify the claims, patents, asserted defenses, or district court ruling being reviewed.
No substantive reasoning was provided, and the disposition is nonprecedential.
Rule 36 affirmance non-precedential infringement
Rule 36 affirmance non-precedential infringement
Rule 36 affirmance non-precedential
Key Points
- The Federal Circuit entered a per curiam Rule 36 judgment affirming the District of Wyoming.
- The panel was Judges Lourie, Linn, and Chen.
- The extracted judgment does not identify the claims, patents, asserted defenses, or district court ruling being reviewed.
- No substantive reasoning was provided, and the disposition is nonprecedential.
How this summary was made: Drafted with AI from the court's opinion or order. Read the document itself before relying on the summary. Editorial policy
New to Federal Circuit? See our Federal Circuit page