CAFC-PTOSeptember 11, 2026·25-1596·Affirmed.
WIPQTUS, INC. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Holding
The Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB without opinion under Federal Circuit Rule 36. The judgment provides no reasoning or issue-specific holding beyond affirmance.
Why It Matters
Because this is a nonprecedential Rule 36 affirmance, it resolves the parties’ appeal but provides no new guidance on the underlying PTAB issues.
Full Summary
WIPQTUS, INC. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT]
The Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB without opinion under Federal Circuit Rule 36. The judgment provides no reasoning or issue-specific holding beyond affirmance.
Because this is a nonprecedential Rule 36 affirmance, it resolves the parties’ appeal but provides no new guidance on the underlying PTAB issues.
Affirmed.
The appeal came from the PTAB in IPR2024-00023.
The Federal Circuit issued a per curiam Rule 36 judgment.
The extracted judgment does not identify the challenged patent claims, technology, prior art grounds, or issues on appeal.
The court affirmed the PTAB’s decision without a written opinion.
The disposition is expressly nonprecedential.
Rule 36 affirmance non-precedential
Rule 36 affirmance non-precedential
Rule 36 affirmance non-precedential
Key Points
- The appeal came from the PTAB in IPR2024-00023.
- The Federal Circuit issued a per curiam Rule 36 judgment.
- The extracted judgment does not identify the challenged patent claims, technology, prior art grounds, or issues on appeal.
- The court affirmed the PTAB’s decision without a written opinion.
- The disposition is expressly nonprecedential.
How this summary was made: Drafted with AI from the court's opinion or order. Read the document itself before relying on the summary. Editorial policy
New to Federal Circuit? See our Federal Circuit page