Centripetal Networks, LLC v. Keysight Technologies, Inc.
Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Holding
The Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB. The Rule 36 judgment provides no reasoning or issue-specific holdings.
Why It Matters
This is a nonprecedential Rule 36 affirmance, so it confirms the PTAB result for the parties but offers no guidance on the underlying patentability issues.
Full Summary
Key Points
- The appeals arose from two PTAB IPR proceedings, IPR2023-00445 and IPR2023-01329.
- The Federal Circuit affirmed without opinion under Federal Circuit Rule 36.
- The judgment does not identify the challenged claims, patent numbers, prior-art grounds, or specific patent-law issues decided by the Board.
- Because there is no written opinion, the decision has limited value beyond the fact of affirmance.
How this summary was made: Drafted with AI from the court's opinion or order. Read the document itself before relying on the summary. Editorial policy
- Rule 36 affirmances →
- Anticipation and prior art (§ 102) →
- Obviousness (§ 103) →
- Federal Circuit patent opinions →
New to Federal Circuit? See our Federal Circuit page
