CAFC-PTOJuly 7, 2026·26-1599·Appeal dismissed; mandate issued July 7, 2026.
PICTIVA DISPLAYS INTERNATIONAL LTD. v. SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD.
Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Holding
The Federal Circuit dismissed the appeal under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b) based on the parties’ agreement. Each side will bear its own costs.
Why It Matters
This is a non-merits, agreed dismissal of a PTAB appeal and does not provide substantive guidance on patentability or PTAB practice.
Full Summary
PICTIVA DISPLAYS INTERNATIONAL LTD. v. SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD. [ORDER]
The Federal Circuit dismissed the appeal under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b) based on the parties’ agreement. Each side will bear its own costs.
This is a non-merits, agreed dismissal of a PTAB appeal and does not provide substantive guidance on patentability or PTAB practice.
Appeal dismissed; mandate issued July 7, 2026.
The appeal arose from PTAB IPR2024-01093.
The Federal Circuit did not address any patent-law merits issue.
The dismissal was entered under FRAP 42(b) because the parties agreed to dismiss the proceeding.
Each side bears its own costs, and the order issued as the mandate the same day.
non-precedential
non-precedential
non-precedential
Key Points
- The appeal arose from PTAB IPR2024-01093.
- The Federal Circuit did not address any patent-law merits issue.
- The dismissal was entered under FRAP 42(b) because the parties agreed to dismiss the proceeding.
- Each side bears its own costs, and the order issued as the mandate the same day.
How this summary was made: Drafted with AI from the court's opinion or order. Read the document itself before relying on the summary. Editorial policy
New to Federal Circuit? See our Federal Circuit page