Back to Blog
CAFC-DCTSeptember 9, 2026·26-1620·Appeal dismissed; mandate issued September 9, 2026.

LATTICE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. BH SECURITY LLC

District Court

Holding

The Federal Circuit dismissed the appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) based on the parties’ agreement. Each side must bear its own costs.

Why It Matters

This order is a procedural termination only and provides no substantive patent-law ruling.

Full Summary

LATTICE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. BH SECURITY LLC The Federal Circuit dismissed the appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) based on the parties’ agreement. Each side must bear its own costs. This order is a procedural termination only and provides no substantive patent-law ruling. Appeal dismissed; mandate issued September 9, 2026. The order is nonprecedential. The appeal arose from the Northern District of Texas, No. 3:25-cv-00109-L-BN. The parties jointly agreed to dismiss the appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). The Federal Circuit ordered each side to bear its own costs. The mandate issued the same day as the dismissal order. non-precedential standing / jurisdiction waiver / forfeiture non-precedential standing / jurisdiction waiver / forfeiture non-precedential standing / jurisdiction

Key Points

  • The order is nonprecedential.
  • The appeal arose from the Northern District of Texas, No. 3:25-cv-00109-L-BN.
  • The parties jointly agreed to dismiss the appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b).
  • The Federal Circuit ordered each side to bear its own costs.
  • The mandate issued the same day as the dismissal order.
non-precedentialstanding / jurisdictionwaiver / forfeiture

How this summary was made: Drafted with AI from the court's opinion or order. Read the document itself before relying on the summary. Editorial policy

More on this topic

New to District court litigation? Start with PTAB vs. District Court: Where to Challenge a Patent’s Validity