Certain Foundry Coke; Inv. No. 337-TA-1512 (Violation)
U.S. International Trade Commission
Holding
This amended complaint, filed by SunCoke Technology and Development LLC and Jewell Coke Company L.P., asks the Commission to investigate imports of foundry coke from seven proposed respondents (five Czech-group entities and two Italiana Coke entities) that allegedly infringe U.S. Patent No. 12,600,915. The document does not say what changed from the original complaint, though it refers to the initial Complaint in this Investigation.
Why It Matters
The complaint targets imported foundry coke used in cupola furnaces, which SunCoke says competes with its domestic production at the Jewell facility in Virginia. SunCoke seeks a limited exclusion order, cease-and-desist orders and a bond during the 60-day Presidential review period. The case rests on a patent covering oblong coke with specified length-to-width ratio and sulfur, moisture, fixed carbon and ash levels.
Full Summary
Key Points
- Complainants are SunCoke T&D (patent owner) and Jewell (licensee and operator of the Jewell facility in Oakwood, Virginia).
- Proposed respondents are MTX Group a.s., OKK Koksovny a.s., METALIMEX a.s., METALIMEX Deutschland GmbH and AMEX Coal Sp. z o.o. (Czech coke group), plus Italiana Coke S.r.l. and Terminal Alti Fondali Savona S.r.l.
- Asserted patent is U.S. Patent No. 12,600,915, issued April 14, 2026. Claims 1-4, 5 and 7-13 are asserted against the Czech coke and claims 1, 3-4, 5 and 7-13 against the Italiana coke, under direct, induced and contributory infringement theories, literally or by equivalents.
- Accused products are foundry coke imported by the Czech and Italiana groups. The complaint cites test certificates, claim charts and import bill of lading data.
- Domestic industry is alleged at the Jewell facility, based on practice of at least one claim and investments in plant and equipment, labor and capital, and engineering and R&D under Section 337(a)(3)(A)-(C).
- Relief sought is a permanent limited exclusion order, cease-and-desist orders against each proposed respondent, and a bond during Presidential review.
Related Documents
- Supplemental Complaint · 337-TA-1512 · June 30, 2026Certain Foundry Coke; Inv. No. 337-TA-1512 (Violation)
- Supplemental Complaint · 337-TA-1512 · July 1, 2026Certain Foundry Coke; Inv. No. 337-TA-1512 (Violation)
- Notice of Investigation · 337-TA-1512 · July 16, 2026Certain Foundry Coke; Inv. No. 337-TA-1512
How this summary was made: Drafted with AI from the Commission's document; before publishing, code checked that the quotation and the citations it gives appear in that document. Editorial policy
New to District court litigation? Start with PTAB vs. District Court: Where to Challenge a Patent’s Validity
- ITC · Oct. 27, 2026Certain Wearable Activity and Health Monitoring Devices and Systems Containing Same; Inv. No. 337-TA-3937 (Violation)
- Fed. Cir. · Oct. 26, 2026Gurvey v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
- ITC · Oct. 26, 2026Certain Adjustable Child Carriers and Components Thereof; Inv. No. 337-TA-1514
- Fed. Cir. · Oct. 23, 2026In re Carter
- ITC · Oct. 16, 2026Certain Storage Containers and Toolboxes, Organizers, Component Boxes, Coolers, and Accessories Used Therewith; Inv. No. 337-TA-1409 (Violation)
