Back to Blog
CAFC-DCTJune 22, 2026·26-1101, 26-1151·Dismissed; mandate issued June 22, 2026.

VIA Transportation, Inc. v. RideCo Inc.

District Court

Holding

The Federal Circuit dismissed the appeal and cross-appeal by agreement under Rule 42(b). Each side must bear its own costs.

Why It Matters

The order resolves the Federal Circuit proceedings without any merits ruling on patent issues or the district court judgment.

Full Summary

VIA Transportation, Inc. v. RideCo Inc. The Federal Circuit dismissed the appeal and cross-appeal by agreement under Rule 42(b). Each side must bear its own costs. The order resolves the Federal Circuit proceedings without any merits ruling on patent issues or the district court judgment. Dismissed; mandate issued June 22, 2026. The case came from Judge Albright in the Western District of Texas. The Federal Circuit did not address any substantive patent-law issue in the extracted order. Dismissal was based on the parties’ agreement under Rule 42(b). Each party bears its own appellate costs. The dismissal order issued as the mandate on June 22, 2026. non-precedential waiver / forfeiture standing / jurisdiction non-precedential waiver / forfeiture standing / jurisdiction non-precedential waiver / forfeiture

Key Points

  • The case came from Judge Albright in the Western District of Texas.
  • The Federal Circuit did not address any substantive patent-law issue in the extracted order.
  • Dismissal was based on the parties’ agreement under Rule 42(b).
  • Each party bears its own appellate costs.
  • The dismissal order issued as the mandate on June 22, 2026.
non-precedentialwaiver / forfeiturestanding / jurisdiction
Read Full Opinion

How this summary was made: Drafted with AI from the court's opinion or order. Read the document itself before relying on the summary. Editorial policy

More on this topic

New to District court litigation? Start with PTAB vs. District Court: Where to Challenge a Patent’s Validity