Certain Dermatological Treatment Devices and Components Thereof II; Inv. No. 337-TA-1515
U.S. International Trade Commission
Holding
The Commission instituted Investigation No. 337-TA-1515 based on Serendia, LLC's complaint alleging Section 337 violations through infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,320,536, 9,775,774, 10,869,812, and 12,220,549. The accused products are RF microneedling dermatological treatment devices and components, including consoles, handpieces, and needle tips, imported or sold by InMode/Invasix and multiple BTL entities.
Why It Matters
This investigation targets RF microneedling systems used in aesthetic and dermatological treatments, a commercially significant segment of the medical aesthetics device market. A limited exclusion order or cease and desist orders could restrict competing imported devices and components from InMode and BTL-related entities in the U.S. market.
Full Summary
Key Points
- The asserted patent claims include claims 1-8, 11-13, and 16-18 of the ’536 patent; claims 13 and 14 of the ’774 patent; claims 2-6, 8, 9, 13-16, and 18 of the ’812 patent; and claims 1-18 of the ’549 patent.
- The investigation scope is defined as RF microneedling dermatological treatment devices and components thereof, including consoles, handpieces, and needle tips.
- The named respondents include InMode Ltd., Invasix Inc., and several BTL entities in the United States, United Kingdom, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, and Cyprus; OUII will not participate as a party.
Related Documents
- Pre-Institution Complaint · DN-3918 · June 23, 2026Certain Dermatological Treatment Devices and Components Thereof II
- Supplemental Complaint · 337-TA-1515 · July 6, 2026Certain Dermatological Treatment Devices and Components Thereof II; Inv. No. 337-TA-1515 (Violation)
- Supplemental Complaint · 337-TA-1515 · July 13, 2026Certain Dermatological Treatment Devices and Components Thereof II; Inv. No. 337-TA-1515 (Violation)
How this summary was made: Drafted with AI from the Commission's document. Read the document itself before relying on the summary. Editorial policy
New to District court litigation? Start with PTAB vs. District Court: Where to Challenge a Patent’s Validity
- ITC · Oct. 27, 2026Certain Wearable Activity and Health Monitoring Devices and Systems Containing Same; Inv. No. 337-TA-3937 (Violation)
- Fed. Cir. · Oct. 26, 2026Gurvey v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
- ITC · Oct. 26, 2026Certain Adjustable Child Carriers and Components Thereof; Inv. No. 337-TA-1514
- Fed. Cir. · Oct. 23, 2026In re Carter
- ITC · Oct. 16, 2026Certain Storage Containers and Toolboxes, Organizers, Component Boxes, Coolers, and Accessories Used Therewith; Inv. No. 337-TA-1409 (Violation)
