PacifiCorp et al. v. MES, Inc.
Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Holding
The Board denied institution under 35 U.S.C. § 314(a) in IPR2025-00425 challenging claims of U.S. Patent No. 10,589,225, which concerns mercury-emissions control technology for power-plant flue gas. The denial was not based on evaluation of the asserted prior-art grounds; after Director-review remand and RPI/privity discovery under § 315(b), the Board followed the supplemental Director-review instruction to maintain at most one IPR against the patent and instituted the companion IPR2025-00424 instead.
Why It Matters
Practitioners filing multiple petitions should expect the Board, especially after Director involvement, to hold petitioners to their petition-ranking/explanation and maintain only one proceeding even if more than one petition was initially instituted. A companion institution can effectively moot a second petition without a merits analysis.
How this summary was made: Drafted with AI from the Board's or the Director's decision. Read the document itself before relying on the summary. Editorial policy
- Anticipation and prior art (§ 102) →
- Obviousness (§ 103) →
- Claim construction →
- PTAB discretionary denial →
- PTAB Director Review →
New to Patent prosecution? See our Patent prosecution page
- Fed. Cir. · Oct. 19, 2026Google LLC v. Valtrus Innovations Ltd.
- ITC · Oct. 16, 2026Certain Storage Containers and Toolboxes, Organizers, Component Boxes, Coolers, and Accessories Used Therewith; Inv. No. 337-TA-1409 (Violation)
- Fed. Cir. · Oct. 14, 2026Syngenta Crop Protection AG v. UPL Ltd.
- Fed. Cir. · Sept. 30, 2026In re Medical Components, Inc.
- Fed. Cir. · Sept. 21, 2026In re Gomez