Back to Blog
CAFC-PTOAugust 19, 2026·26-1978·Appeal dismissed; mandate issued August 19, 2026.

In re Printify, Inc.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Holding

The Federal Circuit dismissed the appeal pursuant to the parties’ Rule 42(b) stipulation. Each side must bear its own costs.

Why It Matters

This is a procedural termination only, with no substantive patent-law ruling from the Federal Circuit.

Full Summary

In re Printify, Inc. The Federal Circuit dismissed the appeal pursuant to the parties’ Rule 42(b) stipulation. Each side must bear its own costs. This is a procedural termination only, with no substantive patent-law ruling from the Federal Circuit. Appeal dismissed; mandate issued August 19, 2026. The order is nonprecedential. The appeal arose from the PTAB, but the order does not identify the substantive patent issue. The parties jointly stipulated to voluntary dismissal under FRAP 42(b). The Federal Circuit dismissed the appeal and ordered each side to bear its own costs. non-precedential standing / jurisdiction waiver / forfeiture non-precedential standing / jurisdiction waiver / forfeiture non-precedential standing / jurisdiction

Key Points

  • The order is nonprecedential.
  • The appeal arose from the PTAB, but the order does not identify the substantive patent issue.
  • The parties jointly stipulated to voluntary dismissal under FRAP 42(b).
  • The Federal Circuit dismissed the appeal and ordered each side to bear its own costs.
non-precedentialstanding / jurisdictionwaiver / forfeiture
Read Full Opinion

How this summary was made: Drafted with AI from the court's opinion or order. Read the document itself before relying on the summary. Editorial policy

More on this topic

New to District court litigation? Start with PTAB vs. District Court: Where to Challenge a Patent’s Validity