Back to Blog
ITCMay 28, 2026·337-TA-3911·COMPLAINT FILED

Certain Systems, Devices, Software, Compositions, Chemicals, and Laboratory Supplies for Studying Proteins; Inv. No. 337-TA-3911 (Violation)

U.S. International Trade Commission

Holding

Seer, Inc. and The Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Inc. filed a Section 337 complaint against proposed respondent Nanomics Biotechnology Co., Ltd. alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 11,435,360; 11,630,112; 12,050,222; 12,228,566; and 12,590,948. The accused products are Nanomics’ Proteonano proteomics platform, including automated workstations, assay/enrichment kits, nanoparticles, reagents, software, and related laboratory consumables for protein/proteome analysis.

Why It Matters

The complaint targets competing nanoparticle-based proteomics technology used to enrich and analyze low-abundance proteins in biological samples, a commercially important area for mass-spectrometry-based biomarker discovery. Complainants allege Nanomics copied Seer’s Proteograph platform and seek a limited exclusion order, cease-and-desist order, and bond to block importation and U.S. commercialization of the accused products.

Full Summary

Seer, Inc. and The Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Inc. filed a Section 337 complaint against proposed respondent Nanomics Biotechnology Co., Ltd. alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 11,435,360; 11,630,112; 12,050,222; 12,228,566; and 12,590,948. The accused products are Nanomics’ Proteonano proteomics platform, including automated workstations, assay/enrichment kits, nanoparticles, reagents, software, and related laboratory consumables for protein/proteome analysis. The complaint targets competing nanoparticle-based proteomics technology used to enrich and analyze low-abundance proteins in biological samples, a commercially important area for mass-spectrometry-based biomarker discovery. Complainants allege Nanomics copied Seer’s Proteograph platform and seek a limited exclusion order, cease-and-desist order, and bond to block importation and U.S. commercialization of the accused products. Complainants assert direct, induced, and contributory infringement based on Nanomics’ importation, sale for importation, and post-importation sale/use of Proteonano workstations and enrichment kits. The complaint alleges a domestic industry through Seer’s U.S.-based development, manufacturing, research, engineering, support, and commercialization of Proteograph assay kits and automation instruments practicing the asserted patents. Requested relief includes institution of a Section 337 investigation, a limited exclusion order, cease-and-desist order, and bonding during the Presidential review period.

Key Points

  • Complainants assert direct, induced, and contributory infringement based on Nanomics’ importation, sale for importation, and post-importation sale/use of Proteonano workstations and enrichment kits.
  • The complaint alleges a domestic industry through Seer’s U.S.-based development, manufacturing, research, engineering, support, and commercialization of Proteograph assay kits and automation instruments practicing the asserted patents.
  • Requested relief includes institution of a Section 337 investigation, a limited exclusion order, cease-and-desist order, and bonding during the Presidential review period.
infringementdomestic industryexclusion ordercease & desist

How this summary was made: Drafted with AI from the Commission's document. Read the document itself before relying on the summary. Editorial policy

More on this topic

New to District court litigation? Start with PTAB vs. District Court: Where to Challenge a Patent’s Validity