RJ TECHNOLOGY LLC v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Holding
The Federal Circuit granted the motion to the extent it dismissed the appeal. The court ordered each party to bear its own costs.
Why It Matters
This nonprecedential order is a reminder that the Federal Circuit may resolve an assertedly moot PTAB appeal through Rule 42(b) voluntary dismissal without reaching any patentability or jurisdictional merits.
Full Summary
Key Points
- The appeal arose from two PTAB IPR proceedings, but the order does not describe the challenged patent, claims, technology, or PTAB merits ruling.
- RJ Technology filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal as moot.
- The Federal Circuit construed the filing as a voluntary-dismissal motion under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b).
- The court dismissed the appeal and allocated costs so that each party bears its own.
- No patent-law merits issue—such as obviousness, claim construction, or written description—was decided.
How this summary was made: Drafted with AI from the court's opinion or order. Read the document itself before relying on the summary. Editorial policy
- Written description, enablement and indefiniteness (§ 112) →
- Obviousness (§ 103) →
- Claim construction →
- Standing and jurisdiction →
- Federal Circuit patent opinions →
New to Patent prosecution? See our Patent prosecution page
- PTAB Director Review · Oct. 19, 2026Tesla, Inc. v. Intellectual Ventures II
- Fed. Cir. · Oct. 7, 2026In re Gamble
- Fed. Cir. · Oct. 2, 2026Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. v. Inari Agriculture, Inc.
- Fed. Cir. · Oct. 1, 2026Satius Holding, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
- Fed. Cir. · Sept. 30, 2026TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL GMBH v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
