Back to Blog
CAFC-DCTJune 15, 2026·26-1450·Appeal dismissed; order issued as the mandate on June 15, 2026.

3S Americas Inc. v. Cooper New Energy Co. Ltd.

District Court

Holding

The Federal Circuit dismissed the appeal under Rule 42(b) based on the parties’ agreement. Each side will bear its own costs.

Why It Matters

This is a nonprecedential procedural disposition with no substantive patent-law ruling.

Full Summary

3S Americas Inc. v. Cooper New Energy Co. Ltd. The Federal Circuit dismissed the appeal under Rule 42(b) based on the parties’ agreement. Each side will bear its own costs. This is a nonprecedential procedural disposition with no substantive patent-law ruling. Appeal dismissed; order issued as the mandate on June 15, 2026. The appeal came from the District of Arizona in No. 2:25-cv-01690-MTL. The parties agreed to dismiss the Federal Circuit proceeding under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). The court did not address any merits issue, patent-law doctrine, or district-court ruling. Costs were allocated with each side bearing its own costs, and the order issued as the mandate the same day. non-precedential standing / jurisdiction waiver / forfeiture non-precedential standing / jurisdiction waiver / forfeiture non-precedential standing / jurisdiction

Key Points

  • The appeal came from the District of Arizona in No. 2:25-cv-01690-MTL.
  • The parties agreed to dismiss the Federal Circuit proceeding under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b).
  • The court did not address any merits issue, patent-law doctrine, or district-court ruling.
  • Costs were allocated with each side bearing its own costs, and the order issued as the mandate the same day.
non-precedentialstanding / jurisdictionwaiver / forfeiture
Read Full Opinion

How this summary was made: Drafted with AI from the court's opinion or order. Read the document itself before relying on the summary. Editorial policy

More on this topic

New to District court litigation? Start with PTAB vs. District Court: Where to Challenge a Patent’s Validity