Lenovo (United States) Inc. v. International Trade Commission
International Trade Commission
Holding
The Federal Circuit dismissed the appeal by agreement of the parties under Rule 42(b). Each side will bear its own costs.
Why It Matters
This is a procedural termination with no merits ruling, so it does not affect substantive ITC or patent-law doctrine.
Full Summary
Key Points
- The order is expressly nonprecedential.
- The appeal came from ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-1382.
- The parties agreed to dismiss the appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b).
- The Federal Circuit dismissed the proceeding and ordered each side to bear its own costs.
- No patent-law merits issue—such as infringement, domestic industry, or remedy—was addressed in the order.
How this summary was made: Drafted with AI from the court's opinion or order. Read the document itself before relying on the summary. Editorial policy
New to District court litigation? Start with PTAB vs. District Court: Where to Challenge a Patent’s Validity
- ITC · Oct. 27, 2026Certain Wearable Activity and Health Monitoring Devices and Systems Containing Same; Inv. No. 337-TA-3937 (Violation)
- Fed. Cir. · Oct. 26, 2026Gurvey v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
- ITC · Oct. 26, 2026Certain Adjustable Child Carriers and Components Thereof; Inv. No. 337-TA-1514
- Fed. Cir. · Oct. 23, 2026In re Carter
- ITC · Oct. 16, 2026Certain Storage Containers and Toolboxes, Organizers, Component Boxes, Coolers, and Accessories Used Therewith; Inv. No. 337-TA-1409 (Violation)
