Back to Blog
CAFC-PTOJune 25, 2026·25-1588, 25-1589·Dismissed; mandate issued June 25, 2026.

GOTV Streaming, LLC v. Netflix, Inc.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Holding

The Federal Circuit dismissed the appeals by agreement of the parties under Rule 42(b). Each side must bear its own costs.

Why It Matters

This order ends the PTAB appeals without any Federal Circuit ruling on the merits of the IPR issues.

Full Summary

GOTV Streaming, LLC v. Netflix, Inc. The Federal Circuit dismissed the appeals by agreement of the parties under Rule 42(b). Each side must bear its own costs. This order ends the PTAB appeals without any Federal Circuit ruling on the merits of the IPR issues. Dismissed; mandate issued June 25, 2026. The order is nonprecedential and contains no substantive patent-law analysis. The appeals arose from PTAB IPR proceedings, Nos. IPR2023-00757 and IPR2023-00758. The parties agreed to dismissal under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). The Federal Circuit dismissed the proceeding and ordered each side to bear its own costs. The mandate issued the same day as the dismissal order. non-precedential standing / jurisdiction waiver / forfeiture non-precedential standing / jurisdiction waiver / forfeiture non-precedential standing / jurisdiction

Key Points

  • The order is nonprecedential and contains no substantive patent-law analysis.
  • The appeals arose from PTAB IPR proceedings, Nos. IPR2023-00757 and IPR2023-00758.
  • The parties agreed to dismissal under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b).
  • The Federal Circuit dismissed the proceeding and ordered each side to bear its own costs.
  • The mandate issued the same day as the dismissal order.
non-precedentialstanding / jurisdictionwaiver / forfeiture
Read Full Opinion

How this summary was made: Drafted with AI from the court's opinion or order. Read the document itself before relying on the summary. Editorial policy

More on this topic

New to District court litigation? Start with PTAB vs. District Court: Where to Challenge a Patent’s Validity