Back to Blog
CAFC-DCTSeptember 23, 2026·26-2080·Appeal dismissed; order issued as the mandate on September 23, 2026.

LED Wafer Solutions LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

District Court

Holding

The Federal Circuit dismissed the appeal under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b) by agreement of the parties. Each side must bear its own costs.

Why It Matters

This is a nonprecedential procedural termination with no merits ruling on any patent issue.

Full Summary

LED Wafer Solutions LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. The Federal Circuit dismissed the appeal under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b) by agreement of the parties. Each side must bear its own costs. This is a nonprecedential procedural termination with no merits ruling on any patent issue. Appeal dismissed; order issued as the mandate on September 23, 2026. The order is nonprecedential and contains no substantive patent-law analysis. The appeal came from the Northern District of California, No. 4:22-cv-04809-AMO. The parties agreed to dismiss the Federal Circuit proceeding under FRAP 42(b). The court ordered each side to bear its own costs and issued the order as the mandate the same day. non-precedential standing / jurisdiction waiver / forfeiture non-precedential standing / jurisdiction waiver / forfeiture non-precedential waiver / forfeiture

Key Points

  • The order is nonprecedential and contains no substantive patent-law analysis.
  • The appeal came from the Northern District of California, No. 4:22-cv-04809-AMO.
  • The parties agreed to dismiss the Federal Circuit proceeding under FRAP 42(b).
  • The court ordered each side to bear its own costs and issued the order as the mandate the same day.
non-precedentialstanding / jurisdictionwaiver / forfeiture
Read Full Opinion

How this summary was made: Drafted with AI from the court's opinion or order. Read the document itself before relying on the summary. Editorial policy

More on this topic

New to District court litigation? Start with PTAB vs. District Court: Where to Challenge a Patent’s Validity