CAFC-PTOJuly 20, 2026·26-1270, 26-1438·Dismissed; mandate issued July 20, 2026.
Weatherford U.S., L.P. v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.
Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Holding
The Federal Circuit dismissed the appeal and cross-appeal by agreement of the parties under Rule 42(b). Each side bears its own costs.
Why It Matters
The order ends Federal Circuit review of the PTAB proceeding without any merits ruling on the IPR issues.
Full Summary
Weatherford U.S., L.P. v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.
The Federal Circuit dismissed the appeal and cross-appeal by agreement of the parties under Rule 42(b). Each side bears its own costs.
The order ends Federal Circuit review of the PTAB proceeding without any merits ruling on the IPR issues.
Dismissed; mandate issued July 20, 2026.
The order is nonprecedential and contains no merits analysis.
The appeal arose from PTAB IPR2024-00990.
Both the appeal and cross-appeal were dismissed by agreement under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b).
The court ordered each side to bear its own costs and issued the mandate the same day.
non-precedential standing / jurisdiction waiver / forfeiture
non-precedential standing / jurisdiction waiver / forfeiture
non-precedential standing / jurisdiction
Key Points
- The order is nonprecedential and contains no merits analysis.
- The appeal arose from PTAB IPR2024-00990.
- Both the appeal and cross-appeal were dismissed by agreement under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b).
- The court ordered each side to bear its own costs and issued the mandate the same day.
How this summary was made: Drafted with AI from the court's opinion or order. Read the document itself before relying on the summary. Editorial policy
New to District court litigation? Start with PTAB vs. District Court: Where to Challenge a Patent’s Validity