Nomad Goods, Inc. v. Nomad Grill LLC
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
Holding
The Federal Circuit granted Nomad Goods’ motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal. The court awarded costs to Nomad Grill and issued the mandate the same day.
Why It Matters
For appellate practice, the order is a reminder that a voluntary dismissal may be granted even over opposition, with costs awarded to the appellee.
Full Summary
Key Points
- This is a nonprecedential order, not a patent merits decision.
- The appeal arose from the TTAB, not the PTAB; no patent-law issue was decided.
- Nomad Goods sought voluntary dismissal under FRAP 42(b), and Nomad Grill opposed.
- The Federal Circuit granted dismissal and taxed costs against Nomad Goods in favor of Nomad Grill.
- The order issued as the mandate on October 2, 2026.
How this summary was made: Drafted with AI from the court's opinion or order. Read the document itself before relying on the summary. Editorial policy
New to District court litigation? Start with PTAB vs. District Court: Where to Challenge a Patent’s Validity
