CAFC-DCTSeptember 4, 2026·26-2038·Appeal dismissed; order issued as the mandate on September 4, 2026.
JETBLACK CYCLING PTY LTD. v. WAHOO FITNESS L.L.C.
District Court
Holding
The Federal Circuit granted the appellant's unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal. Each side must bear its own costs.
Why It Matters
This is a nonprecedential procedural termination, useful only for tracking the end of this appeal and not for any substantive patent-law ruling.
Full Summary
JETBLACK CYCLING PTY LTD. v. WAHOO FITNESS L.L.C. [ORDER]
The Federal Circuit granted the appellant's unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal. Each side must bear its own costs.
This is a nonprecedential procedural termination, useful only for tracking the end of this appeal and not for any substantive patent-law ruling.
Appeal dismissed; order issued as the mandate on September 4, 2026.
The order does not address the merits of any patent issue from the district court case.
The dismissal was based on the appellant's unopposed voluntary dismissal motion.
The Federal Circuit allocated costs to each side.
The order was issued as the mandate the same day it was entered.
non-precedential standing / jurisdiction waiver / forfeiture
non-precedential standing / jurisdiction waiver / forfeiture
non-precedential standing / jurisdiction waiver / forfeiture
Key Points
- The order does not address the merits of any patent issue from the district court case.
- The dismissal was based on the appellant's unopposed voluntary dismissal motion.
- The Federal Circuit allocated costs to each side.
- The order was issued as the mandate the same day it was entered.
How this summary was made: Drafted with AI from the court's opinion or order. Read the document itself before relying on the summary. Editorial policy
New to District court litigation? Start with PTAB vs. District Court: Where to Challenge a Patent’s Validity