CAFC-ITCSeptember 18, 2026·26-1638·Appeal dismissed; mandate issued September 18, 2026.
SF Diamond Co., Ltd. v. ITC
International Trade Commission
Holding
The Federal Circuit dismissed the appeal under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b) based on the parties’ agreement. Each side bears its own costs.
Why It Matters
This order ends the Federal Circuit appeal without any merits ruling on the underlying ITC determination.
Full Summary
SF Diamond Co., Ltd. v. ITC
The Federal Circuit dismissed the appeal under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b) based on the parties’ agreement. Each side bears its own costs.
This order ends the Federal Circuit appeal without any merits ruling on the underlying ITC determination.
Appeal dismissed; mandate issued September 18, 2026.
The order is nonprecedential and contains no substantive discussion of patent or ITC issues.
The appeal arose from ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-1236.
The parties stipulated to dismissal under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b).
The Federal Circuit ordered each side to bear its own costs and issued the mandate the same day.
non-precedential standing / jurisdiction
non-precedential standing / jurisdiction
non-precedential standing / jurisdiction
Key Points
- The order is nonprecedential and contains no substantive discussion of patent or ITC issues.
- The appeal arose from ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-1236.
- The parties stipulated to dismissal under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b).
- The Federal Circuit ordered each side to bear its own costs and issued the mandate the same day.
How this summary was made: Drafted with AI from the court's opinion or order. Read the document itself before relying on the summary. Editorial policy
New to District court litigation? Start with PTAB vs. District Court: Where to Challenge a Patent’s Validity