Back to Blog
CAFC-DCTJune 1, 2026·26-1539·Appeal dismissed; mandate issued June 1, 2026.

ZHANG v. PARTIES IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE A

District Court

Holding

The Federal Circuit dismissed the appeal under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b) by agreement of the parties. Each side will bear its own costs.

Why It Matters

This nonprecedential order is a case-termination entry only and provides no substantive patent-law guidance.

Full Summary

ZHANG v. PARTIES IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE A [ORDER] The Federal Circuit dismissed the appeal under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b) by agreement of the parties. Each side will bear its own costs. This nonprecedential order is a case-termination entry only and provides no substantive patent-law guidance. Appeal dismissed; mandate issued June 1, 2026. The order does not identify any patent-law issue or merits ruling. The dismissal was stipulated by the parties under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). The Federal Circuit ordered each side to bear its own costs. The mandate issued the same day as the dismissal order. non-precedential standing / jurisdiction waiver / forfeiture non-precedential standing / jurisdiction waiver / forfeiture non-precedential waiver / forfeiture

Key Points

  • The order does not identify any patent-law issue or merits ruling.
  • The dismissal was stipulated by the parties under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b).
  • The Federal Circuit ordered each side to bear its own costs.
  • The mandate issued the same day as the dismissal order.
non-precedentialstanding / jurisdictionwaiver / forfeiture

How this summary was made: Drafted with AI from the court's opinion or order. Read the document itself before relying on the summary. Editorial policy

More on this topic

New to District court litigation? Start with PTAB vs. District Court: Where to Challenge a Patent’s Validity