Back to Blog
ITCAugust 24, 2026·DN-3933·PRE-INSTITUTION COMPLAINT FILED

Certain Powered Rocker-Recliner and Glider-Recliner Mechanisms and Seating Units Containing Same

U.S. International Trade Commission

Holding

Ultra-Mek, Incorporated, Leggett & Platt, Incorporated, and L&P Property Management Company filed a Section 337 complaint targeting imported powered rocker-recliner and glider-recliner mechanisms and seating units containing those mechanisms; the asserted patents are not identified in the provided Federal Register notice. Complainants seek a limited exclusion order, cease and desist orders, and bonding during the Presidential review period.

Why It Matters

The complaint concerns powered motion furniture mechanisms used in recliners and seating units, a consumer-furniture market involving imported components and finished seating products. The Commission is soliciting public-interest comments on potential effects on U.S. consumers, competitive conditions, domestic production of like or directly competitive articles, and whether alternative U.S. supply can replace excluded products within a commercially reasonable time.

Full Summary

Ultra-Mek, Incorporated, Leggett & Platt, Incorporated, and L&P Property Management Company filed a Section 337 complaint targeting imported powered rocker-recliner and glider-recliner mechanisms and seating units containing those mechanisms; the asserted patents are not identified in the provided Federal Register notice. Complainants seek a limited exclusion order, cease and desist orders, and bonding during the Presidential review period. The complaint concerns powered motion furniture mechanisms used in recliners and seating units, a consumer-furniture market involving imported components and finished seating products. The Commission is soliciting public-interest comments on potential effects on U.S. consumers, competitive conditions, domestic production of like or directly competitive articles, and whether alternative U.S. supply can replace excluded products within a commercially reasonable time. complainant: Ultra-Mek, Incorporated; Leggett & Platt, Incorporated; and L&P Property Management Company proposed respondents: Jiangsu Carya Smart Home Hardware Co., Ltd.; Living Style Group Ltd.; True Innovations & Design (USA) LLC; Living Style (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.; Living Style (Vietnam) Ltd.; Henglin Home Furnishings Co., Ltd.; Nanjing Hengning Home Furnishings Co., Ltd.; Zhejiang Hengjian Home Furnishing Co. Ltd.; Colamy, Inc.; Aurora Maison, Inc.; and Aerisnexus Innovations, Inc. products targeted: certain powered rocker-recliner and glider-recliner mechanisms and seating units containing same asserted patents: not identified in the provided Federal Register notice text relief sought: limited exclusion order, cease and desist orders, and bond during the 60-day Presidential review period

Key Points

  • complainant: Ultra-Mek, Incorporated; Leggett & Platt, Incorporated; and L&P Property Management Company
  • proposed respondents: Jiangsu Carya Smart Home Hardware Co., Ltd.; Living Style Group Ltd.; True Innovations & Design (USA) LLC; Living Style (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.; Living Style (Vietnam) Ltd.; Henglin Home Furnishings Co., Ltd.; Nanjing Hengning Home Furnishings Co., Ltd.; Zhejiang Hengjian Home Furnishing Co. Ltd.; Colamy, Inc.; Aurora Maison, Inc.; and Aerisnexus Innovations, Inc.
  • products targeted: certain powered rocker-recliner and glider-recliner mechanisms and seating units containing same
  • asserted patents: not identified in the provided Federal Register notice text
  • relief sought: limited exclusion order, cease and desist orders, and bond during the 60-day Presidential review period
infringementdomestic industryexclusion ordercease & desist

How this summary was made: Drafted with AI from the Commission's document. Read the document itself before relying on the summary. Editorial policy

More on this topic

New to District court litigation? Start with PTAB vs. District Court: Where to Challenge a Patent’s Validity